[TIP] alphabetical order in testing
olemis at gmail.com
Wed Jan 20 07:17:56 PST 2010
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:52 AM, C. Titus Brown <ctb at msu.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 09:12:29AM -0500, Olemis Lang wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 5:42 AM, holger krekel <holger at merlinux.eu> wrote:
>> > Some way of telling a test runner to consider tests in a certain
>> > order makes sense to me, though.
>> > In fact, I had user requests and own thoughts to allow declaring dependencies -
>> > such that if a test fails subsequent ones would not be run anymore.
>> Probably (I don't know the exact details ;o), but if the first test
>> fails that (should ?) means that something is not right (i.e. behaving
>> like expected) with the SUT .
> Olemis, et al. -- independence of test order is generally considered a
> requirement for unit tests, but not for other tests (functional, UI, etc.)
> where it simply wouldn't make sense.
> If we're going to be dogmatic, let's be specific in our dogmatism, too :)
I don't know what would I've become if Titus wasn't suscribed to this
list . That was an assumption I made but didn't say explicitly.
I'll worship at your altar ! Damn it !
>> Anyway : be pragmatic ! ... and be aware of the consequences ;o)
> I think we can count on Holger to be aware of the consequences!
... without needing a hammer .
Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/
Now `dutest` 1.2.3 is easy_install-able o -
More information about the testing-in-python