[TIP] Result protocol
robertc at robertcollins.net
Mon Apr 13 05:17:46 PDT 2009
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 12:55 +0100, Michael Foord wrote:
> In fact I'm not sure that as a 'collection of facts' a protocol itself
> would even be licensable in the first place.
> FWIW the GPL license on subunit would also stop me using, re-using or
> contributing to it.
This is only slightly useful to know - what would be much more useful
- what characteristics do you need changed in the licence to let you
- what [other] characteristics do you need changed to be willing to
contribute to it
The GPL is my default licence, I use it until-and-unless there are
reasons to use a different licence. It doesn't mean I'm unwilling to
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.idyll.org/pipermail/testing-in-python/attachments/20090413/af6fa2bb/attachment.pgp
More information about the testing-in-python