[TIP] Result protocol
jnoller at gmail.com
Mon Apr 13 05:31:48 PDT 2009
On Apr 13, 2009, at 8:17 AM, Robert Collins
<robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 12:55 +0100, Michael Foord wrote:
>> In fact I'm not sure that as a 'collection of facts' a protocol
>> would even be licensable in the first place.
>> FWIW the GPL license on subunit would also stop me using, re-using or
>> contributing to it.
> This is only slightly useful to know - what would be much more useful
> - what characteristics do you need changed in the licence to let you
> use/reuse subunit
> - what [other] characteristics do you need changed to be willing to
> contribute to it
> The GPL is my default licence, I use it until-and-unless there are
> reasons to use a different licence. It doesn't mean I'm unwilling to
Compatibility with the PSF license typically works well for me.
More information about the testing-in-python