[socal-piggies] Packaging Dippy

[C. Titus Brown]

On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 11:20:37AM -0700, jathan. wrote:
> Setuptools or distutils are easiest, because they put the power of how the
> package is to be installed in the hands of the installer (egg, sdist, RPM,
> easy_install, etc). Setuptools is newer and has a few more little perks, but
> distutils will get the job done.
> 
> Both also allow you to upload your package directly to PyPI as well, which
> is very convenient.
> 
> Your best bet is to just copy the setup.py from another dist and see how
> they've done it.  Here's the setup.py from one of my small projects as a
> simple example:
> 
> http://bitbucket.org/jathanism/cidrize/src/tip/setup.py

http://guide.python-distribute.org/

cheers,
--titus

> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Steve Wedig <stevewedig at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Howdy,
> >
> > I'm looking to package the code I presented on Thursday (Dippy). It turns
> > out, I've never done that before.
> >
> > What is the current best practice for packaging a python library? Eggs,
> > easy setup, or what?
> >
> > Thanks for the help,
> > Steve
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > socal-piggies mailing list
> > socal-piggies at lists.idyll.org
> > http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/socal-piggies
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jathan.
> -

> _______________________________________________
> socal-piggies mailing list
> socal-piggies at lists.idyll.org
> http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/socal-piggies


-- 
C. Titus Brown, ctb at msu.edu