[socal-piggies] Source control: What do you like?

[Andrew Kou]

I agree that git is probably the most powerful and consistent esp if you
code base is large and there's lots of branching and merging etc. Mercurial
feels the most friendly and so I've been using it for most of my projects,
since the code base hasn't been too large. I generally have my projects on
bitbucket. I actually really like bzr but it is bit slower than the other
version control systems.

- Andrew

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 6:45 AM, C. Titus Brown <ctb at msu.edu> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:29:04AM -0700, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
> > I'm involved with a budding open source project and the question has
> > come up: Which source code control system should we use? We are
> > contemplating bzr, git and hg.
> >
> > What is your preference? Have you worked with more than one?
>
> git and hg seem similar enough that you could probably use either, but
> I have had better experiences with git -- I think it's more powerful,
> in the end, and seems to permit easier branching, too.
>
> --titus
> --
> C. Titus Brown, ctb at msu.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> socal-piggies mailing list
> socal-piggies at lists.idyll.org
> http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/socal-piggies
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.idyll.org/pipermail/socal-piggies/attachments/20100616/cd51f3ff/attachment.htm>