I agree that git is probably the most powerful and consistent esp if you code base is large and there's lots of branching and merging etc. Mercurial feels the most friendly and so I've been using it for most of my projects, since the code base hasn't been too large. I generally have my projects on bitbucket. I actually really like bzr but it is bit slower than the other version control systems. <br>
<br>- Andrew<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 6:45 AM, C. Titus Brown <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ctb@msu.edu">ctb@msu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:29:04AM -0700, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:<br>
> I'm involved with a budding open source project and the question has<br>
> come up: Which source code control system should we use? We are<br>
> contemplating bzr, git and hg.<br>
><br>
> What is your preference? Have you worked with more than one?<br>
<br>
</div>git and hg seem similar enough that you could probably use either, but<br>
I have had better experiences with git -- I think it's more powerful,<br>
in the end, and seems to permit easier branching, too.<br>
<br>
--titus<br>
<font color="#888888">--<br>
C. Titus Brown, <a href="mailto:ctb@msu.edu">ctb@msu.edu</a><br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
socal-piggies mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:socal-piggies@lists.idyll.org">socal-piggies@lists.idyll.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/socal-piggies" target="_blank">http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/socal-piggies</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>