[socal-piggies] Project collaboration proposal

[Grig Gheorghiu]

In terms of technologies we choose, it looks like tornado is the
winner, at least so far.

How about the datastore, would people prefer redis, or tokyo cabinet,
or maybe MongoDB or CouchDB? They all have Python bindings.

Grig

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Christopher Mahan
<chris.mahan at gmail.com> wrote:
> yeah, we can edit on the bitbucket wiki with an account.
>
>
> Chris Mahan
> (818) 671-1709
> http://christophermahan.com/
> chris.mahan at gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Grig Gheorghiu
> <grig.gheorghiu at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Silfheed <silfheed at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> So in terms of what we want from the project it looks like we want:
>>>
>>> functionality from hurl.it:
>>>
>>> generate a request for a given url with headers
>>> display the request and the response in pretty colors
>>> provide permalinks for sharing with others
>>>
>>> additional functionality
>>>
>>> generate POST requests
>>>
>>> dunno functionality
>>>
>>> allow for users to sign in, store request objects (aka hurls)
>>>
>>> There's a wiki that comes with the bitbucket repo, so I can stick this there
>>> once everyone has their say.  If we want to go the Pivotal Tracker way, we
>>> can start sticking stories in there.
>>>
>>> Luke
>>>
>>
>> I created a page on our wiki:
>> http://socal-piggies.org/scp/PythonWebClientProject
>>
>> Please port it to bitbucket then let us know how we can edit it (I
>> guess we need bitbucket accounts, right?)
>>
>> Grig
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> socal-piggies mailing list
>> socal-piggies at lists.idyll.org
>> http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/socal-piggies
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> socal-piggies mailing list
> socal-piggies at lists.idyll.org
> http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/socal-piggies
>