<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Marcin Tustin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Marcin.Tustin@dealertrack.com" target="_blank">Marcin.Tustin@dealertrack.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">This isn’t meant to be snide: if you want nose-style output, why not use nose? What’s the draw of py.test?</span></p></div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I don't know what the OP motivations to use py.test are, but I'd bet there are plenty of reasons [1] [2] to use py.test instead of nose (and vice versa) other than just the output format.<br>
<br></div><div><div>-</div><div>Moy</div></div><div><br></div><div>[1] <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22856638/nose-vs-pytest-what-are-the-subjective-differences-that-should-make-me-pick" target="_blank">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22856638/nose-vs-pytest-what-are-the-subjective-differences-that-should-make-me-pick</a></div>
<div>[2] <a href="http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.testing.general/3748" target="_blank">http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.testing.general/3748</a></div></div></div></div>