<div>
<div>
<span>I'd like to try out py.test; I've found that it's nicer output-wise than nose in a lot of respects. However, we have a significant in-house investment in Hudson/Jenkins automated testing that currently depends on nose + xcoverage + xunit output to tie into the Hudson xUnit/Cobertura plugin support for tracking test coverage and successes.</span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><span>Is there a clear process for tying these things together? I see the --junitxml output flag, so that's part of the issue solved, but it doesn't handle coverage.<br>
</span>
<span><br>-- <br>Chris<br>Not to be taken literally, internally, or seriously.<br></span>
</div>
</div>