Everything at Mozilla is on buildbot.<div><br></div><div>I'm of the opinion that buildbot is good at running lots of things and managing lots of boxes reliably. However, it's a terrible place to track results and/or project status.</div>
<div><br></div><div>We're pushing all the results from test runs to various other tools as part of the script that runs them and letting buildbot just run things, and letting the buildbot waterfall just be a tool for the people managing the boxes to look at status.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-Mikeal<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:06 PM, C. Titus Brown <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ctb@msu.edu">ctb@msu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi all,<br>
<br>
I think I'm going to do a comparison of CI tools soon, and I wanted to<br>
know what people are using in their Python projects. So far I'm<br>
planning on looking at these three:<br>
<br>
Hudson<br>
CruiseControl<br>
buildbot<br>
<br>
plus pony-build as a different (and differently problematic, I'm afraid)<br>
way of doing things.<br>
<br>
I don't get the sense that bitten is used terribly much, but I'm willing<br>
to change my mind if I get many howls of protest.<br>
<br>
Anything else that people think I should look at?<br>
<br>
tnx,<br>
--titus<br>
<font color="#888888">--<br>
C. Titus Brown, <a href="mailto:ctb@msu.edu">ctb@msu.edu</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
testing-in-python mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:testing-in-python@lists.idyll.org">testing-in-python@lists.idyll.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/testing-in-python" target="_blank">http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/testing-in-python</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br></div>