<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Pete wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:275B0166-1D0D-41AD-AD49-AEE4E1BB4914@pobox.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">This book review was on Slashdot today: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://books.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/29/1328206">http://books.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/29/1328206</a>
Anyone read it? </pre>
</blockquote>
Great book. We have several copies here at work.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:275B0166-1D0D-41AD-AD49-AEE4E1BB4914@pobox.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> Should I just use Pythoscope </pre>
</blockquote>
Yes! Please use Pythoscope, but not just Pythoscope. Pythoscope will
generate unit test stubs and with the proper points of entry it will
generate actual unit tests. Pythoscope doesn't yet embody all the
concepts of the book. Even when done you will still need to understand
the concepts. Michal based a lot of his work on the understanding he
got from the book. If you need to retrofit legacy code you should use
both Pythoscope and read the book.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:275B0166-1D0D-41AD-AD49-AEE4E1BB4914@pobox.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">save myself a few $$?
</pre>
</blockquote>
It's worth the money.<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<img src="cid:part1.04060206.06080807@disney.com" border="0"></div>
</body>
</html>