[TIP] Coverage for the Django server
Marius Gedminas
marius at gedmin.as
Fri Apr 26 23:57:16 PDT 2019
Um, I sent a reply to this on Apr 16. Did it get stuck in some
moderation queue? Are my PGP signatures at fault?
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 09:37:38PM +0100, Shaheed Haque wrote:
> Apologies for the bump, but I'm really stuck for what to try next.
>
> P.S. I did also email the Django list, but that was [1]similarly quiet.
>
>
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 12:03, Shaheed Haque <[2]shaheedhaque at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get coverage.py to generate results for code running
> under the Django server [1]. I expected that the initial difficulty
> would be with having the server exit in a manner which allowed the
> end-of-run coverage logic to get a chance to run. I hacked a solution
> to that [2], and I can now say
>
> $ coverage -p manage.py runserver ...
TL;DR is try passing --noreload to runserver.
> Though I could be mistaken, AFAIK, Django does not use any of the
> constructs which are known sources of incompatibility.
It does: the Django autoreloader spawns a subprocess to run the actual
view code (that gets killed and restarted every time the autoreloader
detects source code changes).
Marius Gedminas
--
I doubt, therefore I might be.
More information about the testing-in-python
mailing list