[TIP] recommended way to run nose from coverage

[Chris Withers]

On 06/01/2016 18:30, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> FWIW, I strongly prefer using coverage to run nose rather than the other
> way around.  I guess that's to be expected :)  This may be an effect of
> the nose coverage plugin somehow.

How do you do this?

my naive:

  coverage run nosetests

...gives "No file to run: 'noestests"

Chris