[TIP] Coverage.py 4.1b2: re-written branch measurement
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Sun Jan 24 18:49:03 PST 2016
On Jan 23, 2016, at 08:08 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
>Try it, let me know what you think: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/coverage/4.1b2
I haven't done a detailed analysis of the output, but it's definitely
different. I ran both the stable and pre-release versions over the Mailman 3
core's git master head. Here are the totals:
Name Stmts Miss Branch BrPart Cover Missing
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL (stable) 14386 1127 4377 463 90%
TOTAL (pre-release) 12456 954 3350 309 91%
So I find it interesting that there are now fewer total number of statements,
with correspondingly lower totals on the other values. Except total
coverage. Yay! I get to claim a little boost with no extra work. :)
Is there an easy way to compare the different results, considering it's
reporting on almost 300 files?
Cheers,
-Barry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.idyll.org/pipermail/testing-in-python/attachments/20160124/cda97f1d/attachment.pgp>
More information about the testing-in-python
mailing list