[TIP] Question about nosetests coverage output

[Fred Drake]

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Ned Batchelder <ned at nedbatchelder.com> wrote:
> It sounds like the second repo is using coverage.py 4.0.x.  Reports in 3.7
> used module-style names (dots, no extension).  4.0 uses file-style names
> (slashes, with extensions).  This was done because 4.0 supports reporting on
> non-Python files, such as Django template files.
>
> The HTML report has the version of coverage in the footer.  You can check
> there for sure what version is being used for each repo.

Interesting.  I suspect I'm doing something horrible, but just haven't
figured out what.

The HTML footer definitely says "coverage.py v3.7.1" (screenshot attached, just
for giggles).

This is the command I'm running:

    python2.7 setup.py nosetests --cover-html --cover-html-dir=...

My setup.cfg includes this configuration for nosetests:

    [nosetests]
    tests = kt.testing.tests.foundation,
            kt.testing.tests.composite,
            kt.testing.tests.requests

    detailed-errors = 1
    nocapture = 1
    verbosity = 1

    # Coverage configuration.
    cover-branches = 1
    cover-erase = 1
    cover-package = kt.testing
    with-coverage = 1

This is using the python-coverage 3.7.1+dfsg.1-1ubuntu2 package installed from
the Ubuntu repositories; since I re-build this VM regularly I know I
don't have any
leftover bits & pieces installed that I'd forgotten.


  -Fred

-- 
Fred L. Drake, Jr.    <fred at fdrake.net>
"A storm broke loose in my mind."  --Albert Einstein
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screen Shot 2016-01-06 at 12.49.24 PM.png
Type: image/png
Size: 59819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.idyll.org/pipermail/testing-in-python/attachments/20160106/70322082/attachment-0001.png>