[TIP] Problem collecting coverage for D-Bus activated subprocesses
ned at nedbatchelder.com
Sat Aug 9 08:03:29 PDT 2014
On 8/8/14 1:17 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I've been working on my test suite and I have gotten everything working pretty
> well. I'm seeing coverage numbers much closer to what I expected. Most are
> in the 90-100% range with a few modules dipping to 80% (they are not yet
> The last thing that's bugging me is that I have two modules that just cannot
> be omitted away. I'm still seeing
> both showing up in the report, with understandably low numbers, which badly
> skews my overall coverage. I even have this in my coverage config file:
> branch = true
> parallel = true
> omit =
> This works for everything except those two .tox rooted paths, which always
> show up in the reports. I've also tried adding those omits to other sections,
> but nothing seems to work.
> Do you have any thoughts on why those are showing up, or how to strip them
> from the results?
I would have thought those patterns would work. Any chance there's a
way I can reproduce your scenario?
> testing-in-python mailing list
> testing-in-python at lists.idyll.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the testing-in-python