[TIP] confusing coverage message

[Ned Batchelder]

Oh, and BTW, I started Byterun (https://github.com/nedbat/byterun) 
pretty much to fix this bug, so if anyone wants to help with that... :)

--Ned.

On 1/29/2013 7:54 AM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> I can explain that message.  It means, bug #92 still hasn't been 
> fixed: 
> https://bitbucket.org/ned/coveragepy/issue/92/finally-clauses-arent-treated-properly-in 
> :(
>
> It is at the top of my TODO list, but might be difficult...  In the 
> meantime, you can add a pragma comment ("#pragma: no branch") to quiet 
> it if you need to.
>
> --Ned.
>
> On 1/29/2013 3:33 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
>> Hi Ned,
>>
>> Can you explain to me what's going on here:
>>
>> http://jenkins.simplistix.co.uk/job/checker-buildout/PYTHON=2.7,label=linux/67/coveragepy/checker_checkers_jenkins.html#n57 
>>
>>
>> What does "no jump to this line number" mean?
>> I have a few tests which exercise that finally clause, so I'm a 
>> little confused.
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> Chris
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> testing-in-python mailing list
> testing-in-python at lists.idyll.org
> http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/testing-in-python
>