[TIP] [nose-users] Re: Coverage weirdness with nose
andrea.crotti.0 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 26 07:36:48 PST 2012
On 01/16/2012 09:50 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> Chris, to tell you the truth, I don't know how the nose coverage
> plugin works, and therefore I recommend people not use it. I use
> coverage to run the test runner, instead of the other way around.
> Even if you do use nose to drive coverage, you're better off using the
> .coveragerc file to control the reporting. The source option is great
> for controlling coverage's attention.
Interesting, is there any resource where it's explained a possible way
to do this "other way around"?
I would like to try out, and it might be better than the nose plugin..
More information about the testing-in-python