[TIP] secondary testing tools
fdrake at acm.org
Fri May 6 10:50:43 PDT 2011
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Éric Araujo <merwok at netwok.org> wrote:
> Why not “make test”? Check, lint and test are different actions in my mind:
> test runs the test suite, lint runs code checking tools, and check verifies
> the packaging (it’s a distutils command provided in Python 2.7 and 3.x).
I don't know what you think "make check" implies other than running
the tests, but...
GNUish tradition at least is that "make check" runs the tests. Though
I suspect Guido prefers "make test", since he added that target.
Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org>
"Give me the luxuries of life and I will willingly do without the necessities."
--Frank Lloyd Wright
More information about the testing-in-python