[TIP] Flexmock 0.7.3 released

Herman Sheremetyev herman at swebpage.com
Thu Feb 24 07:40:43 PST 2011

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Michael Foord
<fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote:
> On 24/02/2011 13:10, Tim Golden wrote:
>> On 24/02/2011 13:03, Michael Foord wrote:
>>> On 24/02/2011 12:58, Jorge Vargas wrote:
>>>> This looks great. Thanks for the pointer I didn't knew it exist. I
>>>> particularly love this section of the docs
>>>> http://has207.github.com/flexmock/compare.html as it explains directly
>>>> how it's better (or worse) than the competition. Thanks for sharring !
>>> Although it doesn't compare with mock [1] or MiniMock [2], which are two
>>> of the most widely used Python mocking libraries. I think the compared
>>> examples are taken from Mox which doesn't compare against these either.
>> Michael: when you say "it doesn't compare with...", do you mean
>> "they offer no comparison to..." or "it's nowhere near as good as..."?
>> Just asking...
> Well... :-) It was in the context of the comparison page of the docs, so
> I'll leave you to draw your own conclusions.

And it definitely wouldn't be because you wrote one of those projects,
would it? ;)

I would love to get examples of both mock and minimock to add to the
comparison so if anyone out there is familiar with these libraries and
is willing to take a few minutes to shoot me an email, I would really
appreciate it!



More information about the testing-in-python mailing list