[TIP] Flexmock 0.7.3 released

Michael Foord fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk
Thu Feb 24 05:12:36 PST 2011

On 24/02/2011 13:10, Tim Golden wrote:
> On 24/02/2011 13:03, Michael Foord wrote:
>> On 24/02/2011 12:58, Jorge Vargas wrote:
>>> This looks great. Thanks for the pointer I didn't knew it exist. I
>>> particularly love this section of the docs
>>> http://has207.github.com/flexmock/compare.html as it explains directly
>>> how it's better (or worse) than the competition. Thanks for sharring !
>> Although it doesn't compare with mock [1] or MiniMock [2], which are two
>> of the most widely used Python mocking libraries. I think the compared
>> examples are taken from Mox which doesn't compare against these either.
> Michael: when you say "it doesn't compare with...", do you mean
> "they offer no comparison to..." or "it's nowhere near as good as..."?
> Just asking...

Well... :-) It was in the context of the comparison page of the docs, so 
I'll leave you to draw your own conclusions.


> _______________________________________________
> testing-in-python mailing list
> testing-in-python at lists.idyll.org
> http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/testing-in-python


May you do good and not evil
May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others
May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
-- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html

More information about the testing-in-python mailing list