[TIP] coverage.py: Unexpected coverage report for library modules
Win Treese
treese at acm.org
Mon Oct 25 18:43:46 PDT 2010
I can't figure out why I'm getting coverage reports for standard library modules with the (most excellent) coverage.py and (also most excellent) nose:
Python source:
% cat test.py
"""Demonstrate coverage of library module."""
import json
def test_json():
print json.dumps({'a':3})
Run nose with coverage:
% nosetests --with-cover
.
Name Stmts Miss Cover Missing
---------------------------------------------------
encodings.hex_codec 28 28 0% 9-71
json 39 39 0% 100-323
json.decoder 216 216 0% 3-365
json.encoder 241 241 0% 3-442
json.scanner 52 52 0% 3-67
---------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 576 576 0%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.012s
This is on Mac OS X 10.6.4 with:
$ python --version
Python 2.7
$ nosetests --version
nosetests version 0.11.4
$ coverage --version
Coverage.py, version 3.4. http://nedbatchelder.com/code/coverage
From the documentation, I would expect those modules to be omitted. The coverage information is also incorrect, as if they are being reported, but not actually processed. I tried to trace it down through the code, but couldn't find the problem quickly.
Thanks for any help,
Win Treese
treese at acm.org
More information about the testing-in-python
mailing list