ned at nedbatchelder.com
Mon Nov 1 17:09:58 PDT 2010
On 11/1/2010 11:08 AM, C. Titus Brown wrote:
> For example, I would argue that figleaf implemented some pretty nice new things
> into coverage, and helped spur coverage.py to become better; despite Ned's
> presumably TiC e-mail to the contrary a few days ago, he used to agree with me
> that the old coverage.py was an unmaintainable and unextendable mess. The same
> holds true for pony-build, and twill, and pinocchio, and all the other crap
> that I've foisted off on TiP with varying success.
Titus, I absolutely agree, figleaf helped make coverage.py better,
partly by providing new ideas, and partly by friendly competition.
That's one of the reasons I was surprised to see so much negative
reaction to Testify.
> Cheers, all :)
More information about the testing-in-python