[TIP] unittest2 and the future of nose

Michael Foord fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk
Thu Mar 4 14:04:53 PST 2010

On 04/03/2010 22:00, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:51 PM, jason pellerin<jpellerin at gmail.com>  wrote:
> [..]
>> Third fact: setuptools is dying, distribute is going with it, and
>> something called distutils2 is going to rise to take its place. This
>> matters because a LOT of nose's internal complexity is there to
>> support one thing: 'python setup.py test'. If that command goes away
>> or changes substantially, nose will have to change with it.
> This command is added to distutils2, and should stay very similar.

I would like to know why it was so hard for nose to support it and how 
it can be made easier?


> Regards
> Tarek
> _______________________________________________
> testing-in-python mailing list
> testing-in-python at lists.idyll.org
> http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/testing-in-python


READ CAREFULLY. By accepting and reading this email you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies (”BOGUS AGREEMENTS”) that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.

More information about the testing-in-python mailing list