[TIP] nose2: the nosening

[jason pellerin]

> ps: If nose2/unittest2 could find it in it's shiny new innocent heart
> to say, have support for test generators; I'd die happy.

There will definitely be some kind of support for generators and/or
parameterized tests in nose2. It might be more like the proposal here
http://bugs.python.org/issue7897 than what's in nose now, or
(depending on how much work people are willing to put forward to make
nose2 backwards compatible in terms of test loading) both that method
and nose's 'yield a callable and arguments' method. unittest2 proper I
think is more likely to have support for some kind of decorator-based
explicit parameterization, if I understand right what people have been
saying (which I might not!)

JP