[TIP] RFC: additional data in unittest TestResult outcomes

[Olemis Lang]

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Robert Collins
<robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 12:59 +0100, Michael Foord wrote:
>> Robert Collins wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 12:42 +0100, Michael Foord wrote:
>> >
>> > I want to overhaul how we do outcomes too; we have too many methods and
>> > its unclear what things like:
>> > result.startTest(self)
>> > result.addSuccess(self)
>> > result.addSkipped(self, "haha")
>> > result.stopTest(self)
>> >
>> > mean.
>> >
>> Really? They seem pretty clear to me.
>

to me too ...

> Imagine that you saw that sequence of calls in a trace :)

... but in this case I infer that the only thing that happened is that
a custom testing framework has been used and that such framework
didn't pay attention to Harry Potter's flippendo . IOW, they didn't
include

{{{
#!python

# Hide this module from tracebacks written into test results.
__unittessts = True
}}}

That's why such methods are shown in tracebacks included in test
results . CMIIW anyway, perhaps I didn't understand what u were
saying.

-- 
Regards,

Olemis.

Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/

Featured article:
Sobrepasa las 300 descargas el módulo dutest  -
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/simelo-es/~3/U5rff5iTQPI/sobrepasa-las-300-descargas-el-modulo.html