[TIP] including tests in packages, or not
robertc at robertcollins.net
Mon Sep 21 05:25:50 PDT 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Olemis Lang wrote:
> What's wrong with setuptools test command ?
Someone that just has the package installed is less likely to have
> IMO, if someone needs something like this then it would always be
> possible to subclass TestLoader . Why should that be included in the
> top-level (i.e. very simple ;o) TestLoader class ?
Why should someone have to subclass to get something that is both
trivial and extremely useful?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the testing-in-python