[TIP] Determine test status in tearDown method

Robert Collins robertc at robertcollins.net
Wed Oct 21 13:37:26 PDT 2009

On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 15:55 +0200, holger krekel wrote:

> I like the idea of systematically allowing test code to signal warnings. 
> It is then a matter of reporting how/when to present it.  

This is what I'm working on, but not warnings specifically - any extra
data. Do you think such things needs to be categorised as 'warnings' (vs
logs/ test data etc?') 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.idyll.org/pipermail/testing-in-python/attachments/20091022/14f61433/attachment.pgp>

More information about the testing-in-python mailing list