[TIP] - acceptness test frame work?

Laurent Ploix laurent.ploix at gmail.com
Mon Jul 27 14:10:22 PDT 2009

Dear Yoav
Could you explain what made you consider pyFit and Robot an "overhead
compare to the benefit" ? That may help people suggest other alternatives...
(and maybe consider building another framework if they agree)


2009/7/27 yoav glazner <yoavglazner at gmail.com>

> Hi all,
> I don't know if this is the place to ask but...
> I'm a part of a team that writes a production system in python with
> wxPython and sqlElixir,
> and i wanted to ask how do big projects in python do acceptance's test.
> we tried PyFit and Robot but found them an overhead compare to the
> benefits.
> if anyone has insight on this matter i would love to hear.
> BTW- we are using pymock/nose for unittesting and we are very happy with
> it.
> Thanks,
> Yoav.
> _______________________________________________
> testing-in-python mailing list
> testing-in-python at lists.idyll.org
> http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/testing-in-python

Laurent Ploix

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.idyll.org/pipermail/testing-in-python/attachments/20090727/b5cf475f/attachment.htm 

More information about the testing-in-python mailing list