[TIP] Opinions about unittest 2.7 WAS: unitteset outcomes (pass/fail/xfail/error), humans and automation

[Olemis Lang]

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Olemis Lang <olemis at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Robert Collins
> <robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 16:24 -0500, Olemis Lang wrote:
>>>
>
> If I have a free time in the next few days I'll try to figure out how
> to implement this and 2.7 features without patching «too much»
> existing classes. I will let you know either on success or failure ;o)
>

In the meantime here [1]_ you can read what I think about it , and
also what I found (bugs included :-/ ) after spending 15 minutes
writing some irrelevant test cases so as to illustrate the new
features .

I invite you to follow the debate either in that entry or by
continuing this thread.

.. [1] Assessment of unittest 2.7 API : new features and opinions
        (http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/2009/12/assessment-of-unittest-27-api-new.html)

-- 
Regards,

Olemis.

Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/

Featured article:
Automated init.  -
http://bitbucket.org/osimons/trac-rpc-mq/changeset/e122336d1eb2/