[TIP] continuous integration - what are you using?
Mikeal Rogers
mikeal.rogers at gmail.com
Thu Aug 27 16:20:30 PDT 2009
Everything at Mozilla is on buildbot.
I'm of the opinion that buildbot is good at running lots of things and
managing lots of boxes reliably. However, it's a terrible place to track
results and/or project status.
We're pushing all the results from test runs to various other tools as part
of the script that runs them and letting buildbot just run things, and
letting the buildbot waterfall just be a tool for the people managing the
boxes to look at status.
-Mikeal
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:06 PM, C. Titus Brown <ctb at msu.edu> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think I'm going to do a comparison of CI tools soon, and I wanted to
> know what people are using in their Python projects. So far I'm
> planning on looking at these three:
>
> Hudson
> CruiseControl
> buildbot
>
> plus pony-build as a different (and differently problematic, I'm afraid)
> way of doing things.
>
> I don't get the sense that bitten is used terribly much, but I'm willing
> to change my mind if I get many howls of protest.
>
> Anything else that people think I should look at?
>
> tnx,
> --titus
> --
> C. Titus Brown, ctb at msu.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> testing-in-python mailing list
> testing-in-python at lists.idyll.org
> http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/testing-in-python
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.idyll.org/pipermail/testing-in-python/attachments/20090827/1e1e78d2/attachment.htm
More information about the testing-in-python
mailing list