[TIP] does licensing of test tools matter?
Robert Collins
robertc at robertcollins.net
Wed Aug 5 15:02:17 PDT 2009
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 16:23 +0200, holger krekel wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 09:31 +0200, holger krekel wrote:
> > Hi TIP,
> >
> > i was wondering the other day - is licensing of test libs and
> > tools and issue for anyone here?
>
> let me re-phrase to have a more concise question: did anyone
> actually base their past choice of a testing tool on its license?
>
> My impression so far was: nobody did. And i haven't heart anything
> to the contrary yet. Makes sense, i guess, from a practical point
> of view as (so far) running a test tool is separated from the
> actual distribution and deployment of the code under test.
Well, I started a near flamewar with a couple of things a short while
ago, because they were under GPL.
See the archive for details :)
-Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.idyll.org/pipermail/testing-in-python/attachments/20090806/71b90e4d/attachment.pgp
More information about the testing-in-python
mailing list