[TIP] Coverage 3.0 beta 2

Robert Collins robertc at robertcollins.net
Wed Apr 29 23:31:53 PDT 2009


On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 08:22 +0200, Sylvain Thénault wrote:
> On 30 avril 13:42, Robert Collins wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 13:31 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > While it's still in beta is probably a good time to raise this: Can
> > > this
> > > be changed before releasing 3.0? Misnomers, especially a ‘foo.py’
> > > that's
> > > not actually a Python source file but a distribution name, are to be
> > > avoided. Can't this just be named “Coverage”?
> > 
> > or perhaps 'python-coverage' which is clear, specific, and happens to
> > fit the package naming convention for many linux distributions :).
> 
> you'll find that python-coverage is already a debian package name, but it's
> actually an older version of Ned's coverage, a bit customized and packaged
> by Logilab. I suppose it could become bare Ned's module.

I think it would be better to have Neds updated module than *two*
coverage modules :)

-Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.idyll.org/pipermail/testing-in-python/attachments/20090430/fc3553cb/attachment.pgp 


More information about the testing-in-python mailing list