[TIP] Meta-test methods...

Douglas Philips dgou at mac.com
Wed Apr 22 22:08:16 PDT 2009

On 2009 Apr 22, at 3:10 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
> Yes, nose supports test generators. They're the balls.

UGH. Duplicate code and hacks that make generators special.
They're turds.

I'm now convinced that explicit use of decorators is the right way to  
Maybe, just maybe, a naming convention that would parallel the  
unittest notion of all methods starting with the name 'test' would be  
Really glad I'm not using nose.


More information about the testing-in-python mailing list