[TIP] Meta-test methods...
dgou at mac.com
Wed Apr 22 22:08:16 PDT 2009
On 2009 Apr 22, at 3:10 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
> Yes, nose supports test generators. They're the balls.
UGH. Duplicate code and hacks that make generators special.
I'm now convinced that explicit use of decorators is the right way to
Maybe, just maybe, a naming convention that would parallel the
unittest notion of all methods starting with the name 'test' would be
Really glad I'm not using nose.
More information about the testing-in-python