[TIP] Meta-test methods...

[Douglas Philips]

On 2009 Apr 22, at 3:10 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
> Yes, nose supports test generators. They're the balls.


UGH. Duplicate code and hacks that make generators special.
They're turds.

I'm now convinced that explicit use of decorators is the right way to  
go.
Maybe, just maybe, a naming convention that would parallel the  
unittest notion of all methods starting with the name 'test' would be  
acceptable.
Really glad I'm not using nose.

	-Doug