[TIP] suitability of unittest.py for large-scale tests

[Michael Foord]

Doug Philips wrote:
> On or about Tuesday, April 07, 2009, at 11:11AM, Laura Creighton indited:
>   
>> for the message, but, goodness but haven't we been doing a lot of talking
>> over the last 3 days. :)
>>     
>
> I'm currently at the need to scratch an itch soon phase, and #pycon gave me a huge boost of energy.
> I am having trouble keeping some of the test loading conversations straight there is a lot of activity!
>
>
>   
>> It's been very interesting finding out what is important in environments
>> that are very different from the one that you are doing.  Thank you.
>>     
>
> Likewise.
> I feel a little bit out of place here, because we're using unittest above and beyound. The cool thing is that we didn't have to make many changes for it to become a really useful device testing infrastructure (not complete, but useful).
>   

I see unittest in the same way - as a great foundation for building 
custom testing frameworks on top of.

Michael

> -Doug
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> testing-in-python mailing list
> testing-in-python at lists.idyll.org
> http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/testing-in-python
>   


-- 
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog