[TIP] Fwd: Robot Framework 2.0 is available!

[Michael Foord]

Laura Creighton wrote:
> The usual rational for not using a language for acceptance testing
> is that your acceptance testing is to be done by managers and other
> people who are expected to turn bright purple and explode before
> they would ever write one line of python code.
>
> Something I am very curious about in this context is Resolver
> http://www.resolversystems.com/ (Hi Michael!)  Through it a great
> number of people in the 'spreadsheet only' world are going to be
> directly exposed to Python, in such a way that some of them, surely,
> must just pick it up.  I am very curious as to how often that happens,
> and what happens when it does.  I'd like to get them all t-shirts.
> 'I learned to program in Python and it didn't make me turn purple
> and explode' or something. :-)
>
> If Resolver Systems ever cared to, I think they could build a really
> neat tool for acceptance testing out of what they already have.
>
>   
Thanks Laura.

We have at least one user who has started exploring this idea - of using 
Resolver One as a FIT tool.

It's not an area I know anything about, but if anyone did something 
interesting in this area (and I definitely think it is a workable idea) 
then Resolver Systems would be happy to publicise it of course!

Michael Foord

> Laura
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> testing-in-python mailing list
> testing-in-python at lists.idyll.org
> http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/testing-in-python
>   


-- 
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/
http://www.trypython.org/
http://www.ironpython.info/
http://www.resolverhacks.net/
http://www.theotherdelia.co.uk/