[TIP] unittest & TDD
ischenko at gmail.com
Mon Mar 12 11:49:33 PDT 2007
On 3/12/07, Titus Brown <titus at caltech.edu> wrote:
> -> py.test and nose might be great, but the only way I'd know about them
> -> is if I went searching for them, something most people won't do unless
> -> they hit some serious problem in their day-to-day encounters with
> -> unittest.
> This is true. So, perhaps we should propose that either nose or py.test
> get dropped into Py3K, instead of a new unittest module? Obviously I'd
> personally like nose, but I'd prefer py.test+unittest runner over
> yet another unittest framework.
Well, for a start, stdlib docs for unittest module could include a
reference to py.test/nose.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the testing-in-python