[socal-piggies] Source control: What do you like?

[Chris Hughes]

hg is great, but really spend the time and standardize on git. If your
only going to be using SC for yourself then pick whatever floats your
boat. But if you expect others to work on that source it's probably
best to use the tool that lot's of folks have learned.


On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Dan Stromberg <strombrg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Andrew Kou <andrew.kou at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> git and hg seem similar enough that you could probably use either, but
>>> I have had better experiences with git -- I think it's more powerful,
>>> in the end, and seems to permit easier branching, too.
>
>
> I don't have much experience with mercurial or git at this point, but I
> gather there's something called "anyvc" which purports to abstract away the
> differences between mercurial, git and svn - perhaps others.  It's mostly
> intended for writing clients apparently, but there is a command line
> interface provided as well.
>
> --
> Dan Stromberg
>
> _______________________________________________
> socal-piggies mailing list
> socal-piggies at lists.idyll.org
> http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/socal-piggies
>
>



-- 
sig ver 2.4
twitter: @chews (drunk tweet me)
blog: http://spazout.com
iPhone: 310.933.4533