[socal-piggies] Source control: What do you like?

[Josh Johnson]

I agree. Granted, before I used Mercurial I've only ever used SVN and CVS in
the past. 

The main benefit is the distributed nature of the repos. AFAIK that's true
for git and bazaar as well, however, the main difference between the three
lie in how it's implemented. 

Again, I'd recommend Mercurial, but I'd try walking through the "getting
started" guides for each of them and see what you like. Try out merging,
especially.

JJ

-----Original Message-----
From: socal-piggies-bounces at lists.idyll.org
[mailto:socal-piggies-bounces at lists.idyll.org] On Behalf Of Andre Stechert
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 3:36 AM
To: SoCal Python Interest Group
Subject: Re: [socal-piggies] Source control: What do you like?

For Python?  hg, hands down.  I've used rcs, cvs, svn, svk, hg, git,
and darcs.  Looked at bzr, but it was too slow.

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Chuck Esterbrook
<chuck.esterbrook at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm involved with a budding open source project and the question has
> come up: Which source code control system should we use? We are
> contemplating bzr, git and hg.
>
> What is your preference? Have you worked with more than one?
>
> Insights and relayed experiences are appreciated,
>
> -Chuck
> --
> http://chuckesterbrook.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> socal-piggies mailing list
> socal-piggies at lists.idyll.org
> http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/socal-piggies
>

_______________________________________________
socal-piggies mailing list
socal-piggies at lists.idyll.org
http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/socal-piggies