[khmer] filter-below-abund.py fastq scores from previous file

Jens-Konrad Preem jpreem at ut.ee
Fri Apr 19 23:27:27 PDT 2013


Took another look - in a matter of fact cmp shows the 
filter-below-abund.py of 19th of april is identical with the previous. 
Wwith the exception of worker threads and cutoff values I had changed 
previously)
Jens
On 04/20/2013 09:21 AM, Jens-Konrad Preem wrote:
> OK. The filter-below-abund.py from sandbox did not produce an fastq 
> file (from a fastq file foo.fastq.keep, it produced fasta file 
> foo.fastq.keep.below),
> The khmer was built at 19th of April with git clone 
> git://github.com/ged-lab/khmer.git*, and make clean all. Havent 
> checked filter abund yet.
> Jens
> *should clone the master branch? (Not much of git user)
> On 04/19/2013 07:24 PM, C. Titus Brown wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:14:48PM +0300, Jens-Konrad Preem wrote:
>>> On 04/17/2013 07:21 AM, C. Titus Brown wrote:
>>>> I have hacked this into ged-lab/master branch for filter-abund and
>>>> filter-below-abund.  Let me know if it works (or doesn't work!)
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>> --titus
>>>>
>>> So if I clone and build from the git page, those two scripts should now
>>> put out fastq as their output?
>> Yes.
>>
>>> Or do they need some extra tags at the start time?.
>> Nope.
>>
>>> As a note - the sandbox scripts do not have the #!/usr/bin/env python
>>> line  and also need to be chmod +x in addition to this to be started.
>>> Don't know if it is so as some thought out design issue/feature or not,
>>> anyway thought I'd mention it.
>> Thanks for pointing this out!
>>
>> --t
>

-- 
Jens-Konrad Preem, MSc, University of Tartu





More information about the khmer mailing list