<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi All,<br>
<br>
I am going to assert, based on the discussion, that we will be using
the following licenses:<br>
<br>
* <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">Creative
Commons Attribution 3.0 License (for wiki, text, tutorials, etc.)</a><br>
* <a href="http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php">BSD
License (for all code samples.)</a><br>
<br>
Let me know if you have any objections or if you agree with these
choices?<br>
<br>
-Brandon<br>
<br>
James Taylor wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid91F65C75-3F71-4068-98E6-184E0359DD47@jamestaylor.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Yes, the attribution license:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</a>
This is the same license PLOS uses:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.plos.org/journals/license.html">http://www.plos.org/journals/license.html</a>
On Sep 14, 2007, at 7:48 PM, Titus Brown wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">-> Which Creative Commons license? Creative Commons offers a wide
variety of them.
I don't know too much about it, I guess. Any suggestions?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
_______________________________________________
biology-in-python mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:biology-in-python@lists.idyll.org">biology-in-python@lists.idyll.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/biology-in-python">http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/biology-in-python</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>