[bip] Bioinformatics Programming Language Shootout, Python performance poopoo'd
Andrew Dalke
dalke at dalkescientific.com
Fri Feb 8 11:09:49 PST 2008
On Feb 8, 2008, at 7:40 PM, Paulo Nuin wrote:
> I don't think they would accept to withdraw the paper, especially
> after
> being reviewed and accepted by the editor.
I'm not calling for a withdrawal. This paper correctly reports their
results. That those results are only applicable to the one
programmer who wrote the program just means that the paper isn't
useful and easily liable to misinterpretation.
> I believe not testing programs is quite common in peer-reviewing as
> I had papers rejected that the reviewers never touched the software/
> code.
Sad but true. Most people don't like to dig into someone else's code :)
Andrew
dalke at dalkescientific.com
More information about the biology-in-python
mailing list